A Preliminary Study of Percentage Breast Glandularity of Bangladeshi Women from Mammography Data
Abstract: A study was made to estimate mammographic breast glandularity in Bangladeshi women from generic radiographic data. The primary objective of this study was to determine the percentage of breast glandularity of Bangladeshi women which will affect mean glandular dose (MGD) during diagnostic mammography. The secondary objective was to evaluate some of the factors affecting women’s glandular tissue. A fitted equation was applied for 80 women who underwent diagnostic mammography. The values of compressed breast thickness (CBT), mAs and target/filter combination, were collected for 80 women ranging in age from 21 to 70. The average breast glandularity of the study sample was 43.7% ± 17.35%. Breast glandularity was found to decrease with breast thickness and age. No significant variation of mean glandularity has been found with Body Mass Index (BMI).
A. Eklund S., Thilander A., Leitz W., and Mattson S. The impact of anatomic variations on absorbed radiation doses in mammography, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 49, pp. 167–170A (1993)
NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements), Mammography: x
A user’s guide NCRP Report 85(1993).
Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine The commissioning and routine testing of
mammographic x-ray systems, IPSM Report 59, 2nd edn (1994).
Klein, R., Aichinger, H., Dierker, J., Jansen, J. T., Joite-Barfu, S., Sabel, M., Schul Wendtland, R., and Zoetelief, J. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients. Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 42, pp. 651-671 (1997)
Wu X., Barnes G. T., Tucker, and D. M. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography, Radiology, vol. 179, pp. 143-148 (1991).
Wolfe JN Breast patterns as an index of risk of developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol, 126:1130-1139 (1976).
Byng J.W., Yaffe M.J., Jong R.A., et. Al Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for digitized mammograms, Radiographics, 18, 1587–1598 (1998)
Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ Automated analysis of mammographic densities.Phys Med Biol ;41:909–923 (1996).
Highnam R, Brady M, Shepstone B. A representation fo mammographic image processing. Med Image Anal 1:1–18 (1996).
Kaufhold J, Thomas JA, Eberhard JW, Galbo CE,Trotter DE.(2002) A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. Med Phys 29:1867–1880
Bloomquist A, Augustine B, Pawluczyk O, Mawdsley GE, Yaffe MJ. Estimating breast density using a volumetric technique and full field digital mammograms: preliminary results. In: Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada,June 11–14, 2000:126. atwww.sunnybrook.utoronto.ca/~iwdm2000/iwdm2000_abstract_book.pdf. Accessed July 7, (2003).
Cross P. Doses in mammography: from the phantom to the patient. Australas Radiol 38:20–23. (1994)
Noriah J., Kwan H. N., Donald M. L., Lai M. L., and Fatimah M. Mammographic Breast Glandularity in Malaysian Women: Data Derived from Radiography, AJR: 182 (2004).
American College of Radiology. Mammography quality control manual. Washington, D.C: U.S. American College of Radiology (1999).
Beckett J. R., Kotre C. J.x Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 45, pp. 801–813 (1999) .
Soares D., Reid M., and James M. Age as a predictive factor of mammographic breast density in Jamaican women, Clin. Radiol., vol. 57, pp. 472–476 (2002).
Heggie JCP. Survey of doses in screening mammography. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med19:207–216 (1996).
Geise R. A., Palchevsky A. Composition of mammographic phantom materials, Radiology, vol. 198, pp.347–350 (1996).
- There are currently no refbacks.
©2017 (onwards) Aliansi Fisikawan Medik Indonesia / Indonesian Association of Physicists in Medicine
Print ISSN: 2355-2727 | Online ISSN: 2355-2719