Mean Glandular Dose and CDMAM Phantom Image Quality for Siemens Mammomat Inspiration
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bushberg Jerrold T, Seibert J. Anthony, Leidholdt Jr Edwin M, Boone John M. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging – Second Edition. 2002. University of California, Davis, Saeramento, California. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
D. R. Dance, C. L. Skinner, K. C. Young, J.R. Beckett, C. J. Kotre. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protokol. Phys. Med. Biol. 45 (2000) 3225-3240.
IAEA (2011) Human Health Series No. 17. Quality Assurance Programme for Digital Mammography.
L. D. Hartley, B. J. Cobb, D. E. Hutchinson. Estimating mean glandular dose using proprietary mammography phantoms. Applied Radiation and Isotopes (1999) 205-213.
R. Klein, H. Aichingert, J. Dierkert. Determination of Average Glandular Dose with Modern Mammography Units for Two Large Group Patient. Phys. Med. Biol. 42 (1997) 651 – 671.
R. van der Burght, M. Thijssen, R. Bijerk. Manual Contrast-detail Phantom CDMAM 3.4. 2013. Department of Radiology , Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.
R. van Engen. Supplement to the European Guidlines fourth edition. 2011. Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
©2017 (onwards) Aliansi Fisikawan Medik Indonesia / Indonesian Association of Physicists in Medicine
Print ISSN: 2355-2727 | Online ISSN: 2355-2719